Homosexual Groups Attack Their Own for Liking Ted Cruz

Homosexual activists these days are big on hate. They hate Christians, they hate traditional families, they hate bakers who won’t make a “gay wedding” cake, they hate anyone who implies that their lifestyle is a choice, that it is not normal or healthy.

But an openly homosexual hotel owner found out that at least some activists are equal opportunity haters.

The education of hotelier Ian Reisner began soon after he had a conversation with Sen. Ted Cruz about “LGBT issues.” More specifically, it began shortly after he mentioned it on his Facebook page.

Reisner’s post said that he’d had the opportunity to speak with Cruz, and while Reisner said he disagreed with Cruz’s position on homosexual issues, he took the very sensible and respectful view that “having an open dialogue with those who have differing political opinions is a part of what this country was founded on.”

So far, I’m liking this guy Reisner. He sounds like a nice change from the usual foaming-at-the-mouth liberals we see on a regular basis, and I have to say that I agree with his statement. It is possible, if rare, for people of opposing viewpoints to have a civilized conversation.

However, that’s not the prevailing opinion among some homosexual activists, who swiftly began bombarding Reisner with hate messages for daring to speak with Cruz. Within a day, Reisner’s hotel received at least one cancellation because of it.

Tom Viola, executive director of Broadway Cares, which raises money to fight AIDS, announced on Friday that his group was cancelling a planned fundraiser at Reisner’s hotel, The Out.

“We cannot in good conscience hold an event at a venue whose owners have alienated our community,” the group said in a printed statement.

“This is not about partisan politics or punishment,” Viola actually said.

Uh-huh. And I’m Captain America.

Reisner said he remains a supporter of Hillary Clinton, but that he and hotel co-owner Mati Weiderpass agreed with Cruz on Israel and other national security issues.

“We spent most of the time talking about national security issues and in particular the challenges regarding the defense of Israel to ISIS and Iran – these are the only issues where we found common ground,” said Weiderpass, who did not burst into flames from talking to Cruz.

Neither of the hotel owners should feel the need to justify their views or their conversation, although it seems likely that gay activists will continue to badger them until they swear fealty to the party line.

I don’t know either of these fellows, but based just on the fact that they even talked to Cruz, they might truly be reasonable people.

If that’s so, they might do well to ask themselves what reasonable people are doing supporting people who are actively trying to force them to shut up.




The post Homosexual Groups Attack Their Own for Liking Ted Cruz appeared first on Political Outcast.

Political Outcast

Share

Russians Paid Clintons Millions to Get Uranium –They are now supplying that Uranium to Iran

You have to watch the Fox News story that explains the Bombshell report from the New York Times about the Clinton Family’s corrupt dealings with Russia, Kazakhstan, and a Canadian mining company.

Now the question is, will the media and the US government finally hold the Clinton family accountable for their corruption and crimes?

From the Bombshell New York Times Report that spells out the disgusting details.

But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $ 2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $ 500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of the company’s assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show.

The New York Times’s examination of the Uranium One deal is based on dozens of interviews, as well as a review of public records and securities filings in Canada, Russia and the United States. Some of the connections between Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation were unearthed by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at the right-leaning Hoover Institution and author of the forthcoming book “Clinton Cash.” Mr. Schweizer provided a preview of material in the book to The Times, which scrutinized his information and built upon it with its own reporting.

Source

Don’t forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

The post Russians Paid Clintons Millions to Get Uranium –They are now supplying that Uranium to Iran appeared first on Freedom Outpost.

Freedom Outpost

Share

Johns Hopkins Students: Chick-fil-A Is a Micro-Aggression

Because the CEO supports real marriage, the Johns Hopkins Student Government doesn’t want Chick-fil-A on campus.

Samantha Audia writes for the College Fix,

At Johns Hopkins University this week, capitalism was trumped by political correctness.

The Student Government Association there approved a resolution that called on administrators to put to a halt any discussions or plans to bring a Chick-fil-A to campus, citing the company’s support of traditional marriage and saying the restaurant, if allowed at Johns Hopkins, would be a campus “microaggression.”

The vote was spurred by the recent start of construction on a large, mixed-use development at Johns Hopkins, where a majority of student government members do not want Chick-fil-A brought in as a tenant despite many requests from students.

“The SGA does not support the proposal of a Chick-fil-A, in a current or future sense, particularly on any location that is central to student life,” states the resolution passed by the student government, which noted “visiting prospective and current students, staff, faculty, and other visitors who are members of the LGBTQ+ community or are allies would be subjected to the microaggression of supporting current or future Chick-fil-A development plans.”

Although student government leaders have disputed that their decision amounts to a “ban” on the business coming to campus, one Johns Hopkins student who has followed this situation closely toldThe College Fix their decision is the “nail in the coffin.”

That student, junior Andrew Guernsey, president of Johns Hopkins University Voice for Life, wrote about the recent decision on National Review, stating: “The JHU student government’s vote this week to ban any hypothetical future Chick-fil-A outlet from campus because of the company owner’s support for traditional marriage … sends a clear message that students who disagree with liberal orthodoxy are not welcome on the Hopkins campus.”

So, once again, anyone disagreeing with a Liberal is guilty of “aggression.”

By that definition, the SGA committed a micro-aggression against anyone who believes 1) that marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman, or 2) that chicken sandwiches taste good and the politics of the CEO are not important enough to make one abstain from them. I guess marriage traditionalists who like the sandwiches suffer from double micro-aggressions.

But wasn’t the uproar over Indiana all about how it was wrong to refuse service to anyone? So how is it OK for Johns Hopkins to refuse to trade with Chick-fil-A?




The post Johns Hopkins Students: Chick-fil-A Is a Micro-Aggression appeared first on Political Outcast.

Political Outcast

Share

Out of the Mouth of Criminal Hillary Clinton: “Deep-Seated Cultural Codes, Religious Beliefs and Structural Biases Have to be Changed”

Out of the mouths of criminals comes… well, comes criminal ideas. Just in case you haven’t heard, “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs, and structural biases have to be changed” so women can access reproductive healthcare and safe childbirth. The criminal who said it is none other than Hillary Clinton.

Clinton, who is linked with her husband to numerous unexplained “suicides,” plane crash victims, and out and out murders, spoke to attendees at the sixth annual Women in the World summit. Here is some of what Clinton had to say.

“Far too many women are denied access to reproductive healthcare and safe childbirth and laws don’t count for much if they’re not enforced. Rights have to exist in practice – not just on paper.”

“Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed. As I have said and as I believe, the advancement of the full participation of women and girls in every aspect of their societies is the great unfinished business of the 21st century and not just for women but for everyone – and not just in far away countries but right here in the United States.”

The phrase “denied access to reproductive health care and safe childbirth” refers back to abortion. Excuse me, but Planned Parenthood operates everywhere promoting the murder of babies in the womb. With Obamacare, every health care plan now has to cover abortion services and every US citizen is “mandated” or “ordered” to have an Obamacare compliant plan. So, how is it that women are denied being able to murder their own young? To some, it has never been so easy to condone and commit murder. In fact, because of Obamacare, many citizens are unwilling, indirect participants.

What is the most troubling is the comment “deep seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.” To what religious beliefs is she referring? What she terms “religious beliefs,” many of us term “God’s Law.” The Holy Bible as God’s Word conveys God’s laws for mankind; one of which is “Thou shalt not murder.” That’s not a belief. It is a commandment from God with no qualifiers. God’s law is sacred and is to be followed.

Is it the faith in God that must be changed? Or, are we to accept a secular humanist definition of the Bible in defiance of God’s law at the behest of a sect of society? The death cult of Islam has nothing to change as they believe anyone who doesn’t follow Islam is worthy of death, along with family members who “dishonor” them. So, obviously her comment is directed at Jews and Christians. No surprise to hear anti-Jewish and anti-Christian rhetoric from a criminal.

Someone please explain why it is acceptable to murder an innocent baby in the womb with impunity while murderers of all others are convicted, jailed and/or put to death for the wrongful taking of another life? Why are women allowed to kill their unborn child under “reproductive health care” with the baby being defined as a “fetus” while someone who murders a pregnant female is charged with two counts of murder – one for the baby and one for the mother? With this rationale, it sounds like “cultural codes” have already slipped way beyond what they should be.

Of course, murder, for both Bill and Hillary Clinton, is just another task in the day to day operation of the Clinton mega-corporation of political advancement. It’s no big deal. You just get rid of people (and babies) that have become a liability. Her actions, or rather inactions to increase security and complicity in a cover-up regarding Benghazi, speak volumes.

Being a “woman in the world,” my views certainly aren’t represented by this group of feminist hags. Feminists didn’t set out to achieve equality with men in the jobs market or in relation to pay scale. These “women” set out to basically “castrate” men and shame women who held traditional views. It worked. Women, who cared for the home and raised children, were seen as having no intellect, no depth, no soul and had to be saved/freed from their chains of bondage. Men, who supported the traditional roles of women, were seen as “oppressors” and had to be stopped at all costs.

What has that gotten society today? Women compete with men for jobs outside the home. The family unit has been compromised, almost destroyed, in favor of the feminist viewpoint of “you don’t need a man.” There are very few men left today who support traditional views of the roles of men and women. And, many men have ceased being men – those who stand upon principle, truth and faith, exhibit the role of “protector,” “supporter,” the head of the household, and who view women in a favorable light.

So, who again created the “war on women?” Certainly not those who hold traditional viewpoints and follow God’s laws.

There seems to have occurred too much that has changed in regard to abiding by God’s law. Where in God’s law does it say a woman “has the right” to murder her unborn child? Nowhere. And, rights come from God; so, the “right” of a woman to murder her unborn child was not given by God but by government. God commands “Thou shalt not murder.” The government contends, “Murder is against the law unless you are a woman and want to get rid of your unborn baby.” Any more change leads further down a dark road from which there is no escaping God’s judgment.

Once a Christian society and Judeo-Christian based government abandon the First Commandment of God – “I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage; Thou shalt have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20: 2-3) – the other nine fall by the wayside.

Don’t forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

The post Out of the Mouth of Criminal Hillary Clinton: “Deep-Seated Cultural Codes, Religious Beliefs and Structural Biases Have to be Changed” appeared first on Freedom Outpost.

Freedom Outpost

Share

Teacher Sues Schools for Terrorizing Her with Gun

She was doing her job when a gunman with a hoodie began terrorizing her. He was there with the school’s permission.

Back in May 2013, Phil Hodges posted about the incident here at Political Outcast. He wrote:

A charter school in the small town of Halfway, Oregon was shocked by an unannounced “active shooter” drill that involved two masked “gunmen” entering a meeting room and shooting 13 of the 15 occupants. After a few seconds, the teachers realized that it was only a drill, because none of them were bleeding.

It was all a part of a drill put on by the Union County Police Department. The shooters were actually members of the school staff who had dressed in hoodies and masks and fired blanks from their guns. Students were at home for an in-service day.

After the drill (and probably a couple heart attacks), they had discussed precautionary measures to protect themselves from such a scenario in the future. The drill showed the teachers how much they need to have immediate protection. So armed security and armed teachers were both thrown around as ideas. Wouldn’t it have been horrible if one of the teachers were carrying a concealed weapon during the drill?

Now a teacher is suing. The Oregonian reports:

Elementary school teacher Linda McLean sat at her desk on a calm blue-sky Friday afternoon nearly two years ago when she heard the clatter of what sounded like a falling ladder, followed by running feet.

A man dressed in a black hoodie and goggles suddenly burst through her classroom door. He leveled a pistol at McLean’s face and pulled the trigger. The terrified teacher heard gunfire, smelled smoke, felt her heart racing, she says.

“You’re dead,” the gunman said, and stalked out of her room.

But McLean was alive. The hooded man’s gun was loaded with blanks, part of a surprise “active shooter” drill at Pine Eagle School District No. 61, a charter school in the tiny eastern Oregon town of Halfway.  The gun-toting man was Shawn Thatcher, the school district’s safety officer. 

McLean was a casualty of what she now describes in a federal lawsuit as a harebrained drill in the middle of an in-service day – April 26, 2013 – that has left her with post-traumatic stress disorder.

I have no idea if McLean is exaggerating her symptoms to win sympathy or not. But what happened to her is just wrong and ought to be ruled as criminal. I’m glad she is suing.




The post Teacher Sues Schools for Terrorizing Her with Gun appeared first on Political Outcast.

Political Outcast

Share

Solar Panels Ablaze Prior to Earth Day

When it’s finally nice enough here in New England, my sons and I are looking forward to hiking again. We’ll go out for hours, sometimes all day, and traverse through forests, fields, hills, wherever. We always stop for lunch. Last year, I taught them how to make fire – no matches – no lighter.

Making fire is sometimes no easy task, yet I read online that it’s evidently a snap in Great Britain. Just stand next to a British schoolhouse or Town Hall fitted with solar panels and wait for them to spontaneously combust.

You’ll have all the fire you need as the roof is burning out of control. Just make sure you are up wind, lest you be asphyxiated by the thick black smoke and poisonous chemical fumes. Happy Earth Day!

Breitbart London wrote on Tuesday: “A large fire occurred yesterday at Hove Town Hall by a faulty solar panel on the roof of the building. No one was hurt. Locals have been quick to take aim at the Green party with jibes over their record in office at Brighton and Hove city council, which owns the building.”

George Dalmon, who was in the Hove Town Hall at the time of the fire, told the Brighton Argus that there was big black smoke billowing out—it looked quite major. Everyone had been evacuated out of the building. Somebody said something about it being a solar panel.” The Green party is the dominant party in the town of Hove.”

Another passerby said that, due to the thick black smoke, it must be “quite a substantial fire.”

Evidently it’s not just the hazard due to the blaze local firefighters were concerned with. Because the solar system runs on DC power, not AC, “parts of the system cannot be switched off, leading to a potentially very dangerous electrical hazard.”

During daylight hours the panels may be producing between 400 – 1000 Volts DC and between 1 – 10 amps. More than sufficient to fry a fireman.

Added to that, the solar modules “are manufactured to include a number of potentially hazardous chemicals and materials which may be released as a side effect of the fire damage. Meanwhile in Brighton, locals mocked the irony of the Green Party’s only Town hall being set alight by a solar panel just weeks before the next Council elections.”

And this is not an isolated incident. In 2014, it was reported that three schools fitted with solar panels “mysteriously” caught fire, and that 92 others were told they needed safety upgrades. In 2014, 90 British schools and 27 businesses were left without the use of their “free” solar power, due to potentially hazardous panels.

Of the Hove Town Hall fire, one woman commented, “Didn’t think the Green Party would take scorched earth policy quite that far.” A local man who wishes to see the greenies go said, “Just typical of the greens. Probably created the most pollution over their tenure than any other party anywhere. Added to the fumes from congested traffic this makes for a perfect swansong for them as they exit Brighton once and for all.”

It’s nice to see that, other than the guys on Top Gear, not all of the UK are Green weenies. Yet, they have the same problem over there as we do here. Their political class has bought in, hook line and sinker, to the green agenda.

Don’t forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

The post Solar Panels Ablaze Prior to Earth Day appeared first on Freedom Outpost.

Freedom Outpost

Share

Immigration to Account for 81% of U.S. Population Growth

Amid a record surge of both legal and illegal immigration, the U.S. Census has issued a new report that estimates that within eight years the United States will host 51 million immigrants and immigration will be more than 80 percent of all population growth.

The figures underscore the importance of immigration to the country, and they should make clear why America cannot allow an uncontrolled flood of illegal immigrants or a president who willfully enables them by ignoring existing laws and making up new ones via executive decree.

The Center for Immigration Studies analyzed the statistics and issued a report that estimates one in seven American residents will be an immigrant by 2023. By 2060, that could go up to one in five.

Center Director of Research Steven Camarota said, “These numbers have important implications for workers, schools, infrastructure, congestion and the environment. They also may have implications for our ability to successfully assimilate and integrate immigrants. Yet there has been almost no national debate about bringing in so many people legally each year, which is the primary factor driving these numbers.”

Sen. Jeff Sessions, in a letter in the New York Times, said that higher immigration threatens to kill the existing middle class: “It defies reason to argue that the record admission of new foreign workers has no negative effect on the wages of American workers, including the wages of past immigrants hoping to climb into the middle class. Why would many of the largest business groups in the United States spend millions lobbying for the admission of more foreign workers if such policies did not cut labor costs?”

Indeed, groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and tech companies like Facebook have been among the biggest cheerleaders for more immigration, for the obvious reason that naive newcomers can be paid much less than longtime American workers.

In an economy that really hasn’t grown significantly in most sectors for more than six years, that means the influx of immigrants has two basic options: get low-paying or minimum-wage jobs (as has been happening), or take existing jobs from current American workers for less money, which applies downward pressure on other jobs held by middle-class wage earners.

Assimilation, however, is the biggest threat to American culture as new immigrants combine with the current crop of ignorant rubes being churned out by local high schools to further erode appreciation of America’s history and the beliefs that created this country.

We already have enough people born in America who hold it in contempt, the emperor occupying the Oval Office being the prime example. How is vastly increasing immigration going to strengthen the “fabric” of our country, or however Obama and his crowd of anti-Americans want to put it?

The answer is, it won’t.

Increasing immigration without addressing the enculturation of both those already here and those newly arrived is simply national societal suicide.

 




The post Immigration to Account for 81% of U.S. Population Growth appeared first on Political Outcast.

Political Outcast

Share

Property Grabbing Loretta Lynch Confirmed at Attorney General – See If You Senator Approved

Racist and illegal property grabbing socialist Loretta Lynch was confirmed today in the US Senate by a vote of 56-43, following an extensive hold up of a human trafficking bill in the Senate before voting to confirm her.

This makes her the first black woman to hold the office of Attorney General in America. She will be replacing Eric Holder, a criminal in his own right, who has been held in contempt of Congress and oversaw an illegal and deadly gun-running operation to Mexican drug cartels, which resulted in the deaths of at least two federal agents and hundreds of Mexicans.

In March, it was Democrats who held up a human trafficking bill over unconstitutional federal funding of abortion. Shortly thereafter, as happens often, Senate Republicans started to cave and compromise, culminating in Wednesday evening’s passing of the bill, which does fund abortion, despite the nonsensical language that says taxpayer money can’t be used for it.

“The bill now has two separate funds from which victims can be compensated, a change solely to appease Democrats, who claimed they didn’t notice the abortion language until they had voted the bill unanimously out of committee and to the floor,” reported Rachel Stoltzfoos. “The first is the original fund paid into by perpetrators, which is now restricted to non-medical use, and the second is a medical fund paid into by taxpayers. None of the money can be used to fund an abortion, except in cases of rape, incest or life of the mother — as was the case in the original bill.”

See the compromise of so-called “conservatives?”

It should also be noted that Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) was not even present to vote, but every other senator did vote to pass the bill.

Following the passage of the bill, Loretta Lynch took center stage on Thursday and was confirmed. Again, Senator Ted Cruz was the only senator not present to vote. I think that is pretty significant considering the Texas senator said in opposition to her nomination on the Senate floor on April 23, 2015, “Eric Holder began disregarding the Constitution and laws after he was confirmed as Attorney General. Ms. Lynch has [already] told the Senate that’s what she’s going to do.” However, these ten Republicans did.

  • Kelly Ayotte (NH)
  • Orrin Hatch (UT)
  • Lindsey Graham (SC)
  • Susan Collins (ME)
  • Jeff Flake (AZ)
  • Mark Kirk (IL)
  • Rob Portman (OH)
  • Thad Cochran (MI)
  • Ron Johnson (WI)
  • Mitch McConnell (KY)

Remember when Harry Reid used the nuclear option to push for the simple majority for confirmation of appointees and Republican Senators lost their collective minds? Why have they not reversed that? All that was needed was a simple majority and Democrats found some RINOs to side with them, giving them five more than they needed to confirm Lynch.

Just last week, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) blasted Lynch for helping police steal people’s property. “Loretta Lynch became famous for her Herculean confiscation of private property,” Paul said.

“When questioned about civil forfeiture, Loretta Lynch seemed to be unconcerned about the need for reform,” Paul added. “I think no one who listens to these horrendous abuses of our civil liberties should be not moved to think that we really do need reform in our country.”

Civil asset forfeiture is a practice where police can seize your property and keep it even if they don’t convict or even charge you with a crime

“Today, the Senate finally confirmed Loretta Lynch to be America’s next Attorney General — and America will be better off for it,” Obama said in a statement, but is that true?

Holder said, “I am confident that Loretta will be an outstanding attorney general, a dedicated guardian of the Constitution, and a devoted champion of all those whom the law protects and empowers.”

How can a person that would violate the Fifth Amendment and has a record of doing just that possibly be a “dedicated guardian of the constitution?”

A person that holds to this unconstitutional and immoral practice has just been put into the position of America’s chief prosecutor, but it should concern us even more that the people’s representatives are the ones that put her there. Loretta Lynch will be another Erich Holder albatross around the necks of the American people, plain and simple.

Don’t forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

The post Property Grabbing Loretta Lynch Confirmed at Attorney General – See If You Senator Approved appeared first on Freedom Outpost.

Freedom Outpost

Share

White House: 2 American al-Qaeda members dead; Hostages killed in separate strike

In a statement, the White House has expressed regret for the deaths of two hostages killed during a January counterterrorism strike. Also, in a separate operation, the White House announced that two American members of al Qaeda, Adam Gadahn and Ahmed Farouq, have been killed:

Earlier, Obama spoke about the hostages who were killed:


Twitchy » US Politics

Share

White House: 2 American al-Qaeda members dead; Hostages killed in separate strike

In a statement, the White House has expressed regret for the deaths of two hostages killed during a January counterterrorism strike. Also, in a separate operation, the White House announced that two American members of al Qaeda, Adam Gadahn and Ahmed Farouq, have been killed:

Earlier, Obama spoke about the hostages who were killed:


Twitchy » US Politics

Share
American Sniper
USA Debt
national debt
free shipping 120x60
Archives
April 2015
S M T W T F S
« Mar    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
Categories
HOPE & CHANGE
I Hope you will Spare Some Change

2nd Amendment
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.